Лэймар
"Партызаны не здаюцца"? Ладно.
Цитата:
|
"in the book, there is no question of Arwen sailing away from Middle-earth, nor of Aragorn thinking she might do so"
|
В КНИГЕ этого нет. В приложениях к книге есть. Да и то, можно тут поспорить. Дело в том, что к моменту начала действий "Властелина Колец" Арвен уже избрала свою судьбу и непонятные передумки - это исключительно изобретение Джексона.
Цитата:
|
А мож, некоторые пояснят, что именно подразумевается под загадочными "некоторыми вещами"?
|
1) In both the book and the movie, the Ents are motivated to attack Saruman in Isengard, but the details of how this comes about are strangely different. In the book, the Ents gather in Entmoot to discuss the destruction Saruman has been wreaking on their forest, and finally decide that they will attack him in Isengard. In the movie, the same meeting takes place, but the Ents decide that they won't attack. Merry and Pippin then manipulate Treebeard into witnessing the destruction of the forest, causing him to change his mind and summon the other Ents to war.
The logic of the film version is rather difficult to follow. If Treebeard didn't already know about Saruman's destruction of the forest, why was Entmoot called in the first place? If it's necessary for the Ents to hold a council before going to war, why is it that Treebeard can single-handedly overturn their decision? Even more curiously, after walking for miles through the forest away from the other Ents (remember that they had decided not to attack Isengard) Treebeard has only to call them, and they step out of the trees in unison, ready to charge. All in all, Tolkien's version of this plotline seems to make more sense.
Я уже говорил, что идея быстрой смены решения у энтов - абсурд (из-за самого характера энтов). У Толкиена решение энтов было обдуманным и верным, несмотря на сомнения Мерри и Пиппина (!) по этому поводу. А в фильме всё наоборот...
2) [речь идёт о Фарамире, но я не к Фарамиру привязываюсь, а назгулу в Осгилиате] In the movie, he's lost all these qualities - deciding to take the Ring to Minas Tirith, he drags Frodo and Sam some forty miles out of their way, allowing a Nazgûl to discover the Ring in Osgiliath, before he realises he's made a mistake.
In fact, the idea of the Ring being revealed to one of the Ringwraiths in Osgiliath threatens to undermine the entire plot. The whole purpose of Frodo's mission is to bring the Ring to Mordor in secret. His only hope of success is in Sauron's ignorance of the Ring's whereabouts, but here we seem to see one of Sauron's slaves discovering its exact location, and on the very borders of his master's realm. It's not completely clear how Frodo survives this encounter -
no such dangerous and foolhardy adventure occurs in the book.
И не тычьте мне в главу про Фродо у Минас-Моргула - там
назгул Кольца не видел и просто "возможно, почувствовав присутствие иной мощи" остановился.
3) The first of these is the sheer scale of the Battle of the Hornburg (or the Battle of Helm's Deep, as it seems to have become universally known from the movie, though Tolkien never used that term). In Tolkien's version, the entire battle occupies about ten pages - less than one of the book's twenty-one chapters. In the movie, it has been expanded to occupy almost a third of the story.
Красивая битва, не спорю...
4) The idea of the Elves of Lórien marching to the aid of Rohan is verging on the unthinkable - certainly nothing of the kind occurs in the book. These Elves had no historical links with the Rohirrim at all, and were in any case under threat of attack themselves at this time (a strand of the story that the film doesn't attempt to cover).
Да, ещё и это. Эльфы? Помогают кому? Роханцам?
Если вспомнить, с каким недоверием, а подчас и ненавистью (последнее, конечно, в основном благодаря Гриме) относились в Рохане к Лориэну, становится очевидно, что никакого aid от эльфов быть не могло. А если бы и могло, то люди не были бы им рады - скорее смотрели бы с недоверием... Более того, "мы пришли отдать дань тому союзу". Насколько мой скромный разум вмещает - это говорится про Последний Союз. Однако ж этот союз не имел никакого (!) отношения к Рохану и его людям. Эдайн, эльфы - да, но роханцы? Абсурд.
4) The idea that Théoden is somehow 'possessed' by Saruman, and that he has to be 'exorcised' by Gandalf is entirely the invention of the movie-makers. In the book, there is no magic involved in this at all, merely the whisperings (and probably poisonous drugs) of Gríma Wormtongue.
Про это я уже много раз говорил.
5) Old English isn't just used to translate the language of the Rohirrim, but also their names. This has introduced some peculiarities in the movie version, because names have been moved from one character to another without considering their meaning. So, the boy who flees Saruman's armies early in the film is called Éothain, 'horse-lord', while Théoden's relatively young lieutenant in Helm's Deep has the name Gamling, meaning 'old man'. (In the book, of course, these names belonged to more appropriate characters).
Уж такого-то при внимательном отношении, которое часто ставится ПиДжею в заслугу, можно было бы избежать!